KETANJI JACKSON IDENTITY POLITICS; RADICAL LEFTIST; SOFT ON CHILD PORN  + TRANSCRIPT

Michael Savage on Newsmax TV

Press play below to watch video, Transcript Below video

3.25KETANJI JACKSON -IDENTITY POLITICS;RADICAL LEFTIST;SOFT ON CHILD PORN EMAIL

Speaker 1 [00:00:00] Joining us now to talk more about all of this is the host of the Michael Savage Show podcast, Dr Michael Savage himself. Michael, it’s great to have you back with us. A lot of tense, powerful moments there. What do you make of Judge Jackson’s performance this week?

Speaker 2 [00:00:15] Janet Lindsay, have thank you very much for having me on. I have to preface everything by saying again, I try to see the positive in people as cynical as I may appear. I couldn’t get through a day if I didn’t look for the positive. So she sings again, like a kind hearted person, the kind of person you would want as a neighbor, and I’m being sincere about that. She looks harmless, but she’s a brainwashed left wing fanatic and she is just as dangerous as the squad. Sheila Jackson-Lee, Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters all rolled into one. Now you may say that’s about race, wrong? I will tell you right now, another person who was on Biden’s short list was an African-American judge by the name of J. Michelle Chiles. No one’s mentioned that much, but she enjoyed strong bipartisan support from two fellow South South Carolinians, including the African-American Democrat James Clyburn and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. But she was not picked. Instead, Biden reached down into the well of the far left. She picked someone that makes the ACLU like conservatives. And the fact of the matter is she’s going to be a disaster for this nation. Moreover, nothing distinguishes her in her rulings and sparse writings. She is the beneficiary of left wing identity politics. She is truthfully the most radical left wing justice since Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who wreaked havoc, as we all know for 30 years on our police, on our family, on our schools are crime for decades. Another question how come she was treated so gingerly when you compare that with what they did to Kavanaugh during his hearings? Does anyone listening to this program remember what they did to Justice Kavanaugh? The outright lie, I believe, is the doctor’s office he wants to because I’m telling the truth. I want to know which.

Speaker 1 [00:02:08] This is such a great point, because Jim and I we saw this article from The Washington Post, an opinion piece from their editorial board, and it’s titled Republicans Boast They have not pulled a Kavanaugh. In fact, they’ve treated Jackson worse. I mean, to your point, are they watching the same thing we watch what happened to Brett Kavanaugh? The world saw that and also Amy Coney Barrett. And this has been very different.

Speaker 2 [00:02:31] Well, I I like the Amazon web site very much. I get stuff delivered the next day, a nice little cardboard boxes. But the news owned by the same owner, the Washington Post, delivers rubbish between the pages. Come on. What are they kidding us? Anyone who remembers what went on with Kavanaugh, I was outraged at the viciousness of the attacks. There were not questions. You know, I remember the hearings also of Judge Kavanaugh, Kagan. They asked Kagan about where she stands on the Second Amendment. They were very clear. Do you think that the Second Amendment is set in stone, basically. And Judge Kavanaugh, excuse me, Judge Kagan, Liberal, answered very clearly. Yes, it is. It set in stone, she cited the case law. Why do they not ask this young lady about her opinion on the Second Amendment? Moreover, the First Amendment she wouldn’t even answer what a woman is. She wouldn’t define me. That’s the biggest gaffe of all. This person was going to be in the Supreme Court will not or could not define what is a woman when she herself is a woman. She couldn’t just say, Well, we know it has to do with chromosomes and genetics. You know, I study nature all the time. They’re not confused about what girls and boys are. We are lower than animals. We can’t figure out what a boy and a girl is, what kind of culture you’re living in that would pick an ideologue like her who won’t even answer a question about what a woman is and put her on the Supreme Court. So again, she may be a nice person, a good person, a warm person, a wonderful person, a great person loved by God and all fellow mankind. But she’s going to be a disaster for the United States of America. And I say no. Thumbs down.

Speaker 1 [00:04:11] So, so I work. There’s a wildcard here in terms of who might. I’ll say yes or no here. Obviously, the Senate Judiciary, Eric Dems, they support her. Senator Joe Manchin is the wild card, though. What’s going to happen to get him on the side of the Republicans?

Speaker 2 [00:04:27] He is the wild card and anyone who knows what the wild card is going to produce, what it’s turned over is lying to you. Yeah. Who knows which way the wind blows inside Joe Manchin hat? I don’t know. You know he could go either way. But the fact of the matter is, I think she’s a shoo in. If you were to ask me which way, I think it’s going to go. I think most Republicans are terrified of being called racist and they’re going to roll over just as they did for Ruth Bader Ginsburg 20 or 30 years ago. You know, Ginsburg was voted in 98 to two. There was almost no opposition. People were afraid to say one word about her because she was a nice liberal woman. Now add the fact that this is a nice, liberal African-American woman. I think you’re going to see a shoo in and a disaster for the next 30 years. One man’s opinion. Thanks for having me, Michael.

Speaker 1 [00:05:15] I hope you’re wrong, but I think you might be right. So we’ll see how this plays out. Dr. Michael Savage. Always a pleasure, my friend. Thank you.

Speaker 2 [00:05:25] Thanks for having me on. Love it.

Join now!