District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies claims the goal is reconciliation between suspects and those affected by alleged crimes
The decision by District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, who serves a three-county region that includes Santa Fe, is part of a concept called “restorative justice,” the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper reported.
Carmack-Altwies wants seven of the eight defendants to enter a pre-prosecution probation program, calling their case – that they allegedly destroyed a 152-year-old obelisk last October – “a political problem that got forced upon the criminal justice system,” the newspaper reported.
But her critics include former Santa Fe City Council member Ron Trujillo, who called the DA’s plan “a crock of crap,” according to the newspaper.
Another critic – Virgil Vigil, head of a local fraternal organization – referred to Carmack-Altwies and Santa Fe Mayor Alan Webber as “out-of-town transplants” who “don’t care about our people and our culture.”
The seven defendants targeted for probation would hold that status for six months to two years and perform 40 hours of community service – as well as be required to write a letter admitting their role in toppling the obelisk, according to the newspaper.
The DA noted that the seven defendants were all first-time offenders and would likely not face jail time anyway if convicted at a trial.
She added that community members affected by the rioting damage would help determine what community service projects the defendants would perform.
Carmack-Altwies described the “restorative justice” concept as having the goal of reconciliation in the community.
“It’s supposed to bring both sides together and get everyone to come to a resolution or conclusion about what they should do as part of their punishment – and it is a punishment,” she said. “It’s not punitive, necessarily, in that it’s not jail. But it is a punishment: They have to participate in this. And if they drop out and don’t do it, then we lift the stay and prosecution keeps going.”
The obelisk had long been opposed by Native American groups and others, and was knocked down on Indigenous Peoples Day – which many other communities mark as Columbus Day. The groups had said they opposed language on the obelisk that referred to “heroes” dying in battle against “savage Indians,” the newspaper reported.